(6/12/17 - 6/20/17) This week (plus) in:
Jun. 20th, 2017 10:48 pm Stuff on Screens
My Cousin Rachel (Michell, 2017). After reading and seeing the 1940 adaptation of du Maurier’s Rebecca, I was excited to see this, especially with Rachel Weisz as the star. An heir to an English country estate flits between infatuation and suspicion after his cousin’s beautiful but mysterious widow comes to live with him. The acting was solid, particularly by Weisz, and the setting, costumes, and cinematography were really beautiful. I did fall prey to being distracted by actors I recognized, which in some cases enhanced my experience (waves at Simon Russell Beale and Holliday Grangier) and in other cases detracted from it (sorry, Iian Glen).
The film made me want to know more about de Maurier’s life experiences and how they might have shaped her ideas about women and power. No woman seems to be safe for long in what I’ve read or seen of her stories. Those with personal charisma become dangerous, but not enough to keep them out of the crosshairs. I found myself a little unsettled watching the film ask the question “did she or didn’t she?” (as opposed to “did he or didn’t he?” in Rebecca), but that kept me thinking about it long after it was over.
The Hunchback of Notre Dame (Dieterle, 1939): The Disney version borrows heavily from this adaptation, and well it should, because it is AWESOME. ( Lots of fangirling under here )
Stuff on Paper
The Beguiled (Cullinan, 1966). I read this one in anticipation of the movie at the end of the month. A wounded Union soldier is taken in by the students and headmistresses of a girl's boarding school in the Civil War South, but more time they spend in close quarters with each other, the more their lives begin to unravel. The book is chock full of Southern gothic elements, and the prose is rich without being too flowery. I also found the book really useful in terms of how to tell a story from multiple points of view, including how to distinguish narrators when writing in the first person. Still, the book left me with the same question, I had after watching My Cousin Rachel: what drives the way the author approached gender? Cullinan is a man, but he tells the story exclusively from the point of view of the women living in the school; we only hear about the singular male character from their perspective. Several of the characters--male and female--prove capable and/or charismatic, but practically everyone is deeply flawed: vain, prideful, manipulative, jealous, debauched. I’m still mulling over whether Cullinan’s narration choices were purely structural ones to create suspense; if there’s a misogynistic subtext; or if he might was trying to demonstrate that anyone, regardless of sex, can be corrupted.
Projects
A summer cold sidelined my progress this week. I kept waking up to write, but I usually ended up just staring and sniffling at my laptop, and then wandering over to Pinterest. Speaking of Pinterest, you can find me here, where I have a board of findings from my ongoing writing advice scavenger hunt, among other things.
In an attempt to escape the loneliness of my Hunchback fic project, I’ve signed up for the 2017 Multifandom Drabble Exchange. How distracting can one 100-word project be? Let’s find out!